Turner White CommunicationsAbout TWCSubscribeContact TWCHomeSearch
Hospital PhysicianJCOMSMPBRMsCart
Current Contents
Where We Are Indexed
Past Issue Archives
Clinical Communication
CME
Outcomes
Research
In Review
Editorial Board
Information for Authors
Author Form

Reprints, Permissions, & Copyright
Site Map
 
JCOM
BACK ISSUE articles are $15 each.
 
International credit cards NOT accepted.



JCOM Paid Subscribers
LOG IN
user name:
password:
 
Forgot password?

JCOM Abstract


J Clin Outcomes Manage 
2004 Nov;11(11):698-706
Evaluation of clinical systems for treating tobacco use: a comparison of key informant interview and document examination
An LC, Bernhardt TS, Bluhm JH, Bland P, Center B, Foldes SS, Magnan S, Manley M

Abstract Objective: To determine the level of agreement between reports from key informants and examination of clinic documents regarding the presence of tobacco treatment systems in primary care clinics. Design: Clinic tours with interview of key informants and collection of clinic documents. Setting and participants: 130 out of 350 clinics in 30 medical groups in the Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota primary care network were selected for potential site visits. 95 of these clinics agreed to participate. 84% of participating clinics were family medicine clinics. Key informants were either clinic managers (n = 64) or clinicians (n = 31). Measurements: Informants reported whether the clinic used patient health questionnaires, chart stamps/labels, problem list/flow sheets, prompts/reminders, progress notes, specialized treatment forms, patient educational materials, specialist/community resource lists, or specific referral forms for the treatment of tobacco use. Documents were examined directly for any tobacco treatment content. Results: Agreement was highest for the health questionnaire (kappa = 0.73) and chart stamp (kappa = 0.60). For other clinic documents, agreement was low (kappa range, 0.04 to 0.32). Key informants were more likely to make understatements (mean, 1.74 [SD = 1.33]/clinic) than overstatements (mean, 0.68 [SD = 0.79]/clinic) about the presence of treatment tools. The level of agreement was not associated with clinic or informant characteristics. Conclusions: Until key informant interview methods are validated, direct examination of clinic documents is recommended to evaluate tobacco systems. Proper assessment of clinical systems is important in determining how best to proceed with efforts to improve delivery of tobacco treatment services.

Article

Search the Turner White index to find abstracts of articles published in JCOM.





New issues are posted one month following publication of the printed journal.



View past issue archives:    2013    2012    2011    2010    2009    2008    2007
   2006    2005    2004    2003     2002     2001     2000     1999



Hospital Physician     JCOM     Seminars in Medical Practice
Hospital Physician Board Review Manuals
About TWC    Subscribe    Contact TWC    Home    Search   Site Map

Copyright © 2014, Turner White Communications
Updated 1/20/14 • jdw