Turner White CommunicationsAbout TWCSubscribeContact TWCHomeSearch
Hospital PhysicianJCOMSMPBRMsCart
Current Contents
Where We Are Indexed
Past Issue Archives
Clinical Communication
In Review
Editorial Board
Information for Authors
Author Form

Reprints, Permissions, & Copyright
Site Map
BACK ISSUE articles are $15 each.
International credit cards NOT accepted.

JCOM Paid Subscribers
user name:
Forgot password?

JCOM Abstract

J Clin Outcomes Manage 
2005 Mar;12(3):147-150
Overcoming clinical inertia: a visit-specific scale for measuring quality in hypertension care
Henderson W, Bosworth HB, Voils CI, Dudley TK, McCant FA, Gentry P, Oddone EZ

Abstract Objective: To develop a valid, reproducible scale that quantifies a providerís reaction to uncontrolled blood pressure. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting and participants: 70 patients with hypertension who were treated with antihypertensive medication at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center primary care clinic. Methods: Three raters blinded to each otherís assessments rated each patient visit using the hypertension quality of care scale. This scale includes 4 categories reflecting the extent of provider recognition of elevated blood pressure and action to lower it (0: blood pressure not recorded at visit; 1: blood pressure not controlled, not mentioned in the medical record, and nothing further done; 2: blood pressure not controlled, mentioned in the medical record, but nothing further done; 3: blood pressure not controlled and the provider acted in some manner to lower it). Results: Providers failed to recognize or act on inadequately controlled blood pressure at 48% of visits. The average frequency of scores for all raters was 2.9% (no blood pressure recorded), 30.5% (blood pressure recorded but not mentioned), 14.3% (blood pressure recorded, provider recognized elevation, but no action), and 25.3% (provider acted to lower blood pressure); blood pressure was adequately controlled in 27.1% of patients. Inter-rater agreement was excellent (Kendallís W = 0.92). Scale scores were moderately related to the extent of systolic blood pressure elevation (r = 0.29, averaged across raters). Conclusion: The scale demonstrated excellent inter-rater agreement and moderate correlation with elevation in systolic blood pressure. The scale could be used to measure the effectiveness of interventions designed to prompt providers to respond to inadequately controlled hypertension.

Original Research

Search the Turner White index to find abstracts of articles published in JCOM.

New issues are posted one month following publication of the printed journal.

View past issue archives:    2013    2012    2011    2010    2009    2008    2007
   2006    2005    2004    2003     2002     2001     2000     1999

Hospital Physician     JCOM     Seminars in Medical Practice
Hospital Physician Board Review Manuals
About TWC    Subscribe    Contact TWC    Home    Search   Site Map

Copyright © 2018, Turner White Communications
Updated 1/20/14 • jdw