Turner White CommunicationsAbout TWCSubscribeContact TWCHomeSearch
Hospital PhysicianJCOMSMPBRMsCart
Current Contents
Where We Are Indexed
Past Issue Archives
Clinical Communication
CME
Outcomes
Research
In Review
Editorial Board
Information for Authors
Author Form

Reprints, Permissions, & Copyright
Site Map
 
JCOM
BACK ISSUE articles are $15 each.
 
International credit cards NOT accepted.



JCOM Paid Subscribers
LOG IN
user name:
password:
 
Forgot password?

JCOM Abstract


J Clin Outcomes Manage 
2005 Apr;12(4):193-198
Frequency of client and staff injury during physical restraint episodes: a comparison of 2 child restraint systems
Henderson L, Siddons K, Wasser T, Gunn S, Spisszak E

Abstract Objective: To compare the frequency of injury to clients and staff with use of 2 restraint systems. Design: Retrospective database review. Setting and participants: Youth admitted under both voluntary and involuntary commitments to residential behavioral and mental health programs in Pennsylvania and New York and staff from these institutions. Methods: Restraint events that occurred during 2003 were reviewed and stratified by method of restraint: Therapeutic Crisis Intervention (TCI) and Professional Crisis Management (PCM). Injuries caused during restraint applications were coded as serious (required in-house treatment) or critical (required transportation to medical center). Age, race, and sex of clients and restraint duration were determined. Group t tests and chi-square tests with restraint method as the independent variable were used to compare injury frequency and restraint duration between methods. Chi-square tests were used to compare the frequency of injury by hold method within each restraint system. Results: There were 5580 restraint applications in the PCM group (n = 813) and 1274 in the TCI group (n = 194). The mean (SD) hold duration was significantly shorter for the PCM method (8.5 min [14.4] versus 15.1 min [13.7]; P < 0.001). TCI was associated with significantly more critical and serious client injuries (both, P < 0.001). No difference between PCM and TCI was noted for critical staff injuries (P = 0.404), although a trend toward significance was seen in serious staff injuries (P = 0.094). More injuries occurred at higher restraint levels with TCI than with PCM. Conclusion: The PCM method was associated with a lower frequency of client injuries compared with the TCI method. We recommend the PCM method over TCI for use in children.

Original Research

Search the Turner White index to find abstracts of articles published in JCOM.





New issues are posted one month following publication of the printed journal.



View past issue archives:    2013    2012    2011    2010    2009    2008    2007
   2006    2005    2004    2003     2002     2001     2000     1999



Hospital Physician     JCOM     Seminars in Medical Practice
Hospital Physician Board Review Manuals
About TWC    Subscribe    Contact TWC    Home    Search   Site Map

Copyright © 2014, Turner White Communications
Updated 1/20/14 • jdw